So I can work longer. So I can earn more. So I can eat more Oreos?
That's not how the classic '90s antidrug spot goes. Nor have musicians performed songs titled "She's Your Oreo" or "I Love the Oreos." Dave Chappelle never performed a famous sketch with the signature line "Oreos are a helluva drug."
But maybe he should have.
The research proves what many people intuitively know: Junk food is highly addictive and people eat it even when they know it's bad for them.
New research by Connecticut College professor Joseph Schroeder and his students shows that America's most popular cookie is highly addictive. According to an article on the college's website, the study "found rats formed an equally strong association between the pleasurable effects of eating Oreos and a specific environment as they did between cocaine or morphine and a specific environment."
The research proves what many people intuitively know: Junk food is highly addictive, and people eat it even when they know it's bad for them.
To test the theory, Schroeder and his students constructed two mazes. In one, rats had the choice between eating an Oreo and eating a rice cake. In another, rats could choose a side where they would be injected with cocaine or a side where they would be injected with saline. Rats spent as much time on the Oreo side as they did on the cocaine side.
Rice cakes aren't very interesting, but who knew Oreos could be so appealing?
Even more disturbingly, the students used neurochemistry to demonstrate that more neurons in the brain's pleasure sensor are activated while eating Oreos than while using cocaine.
"Our research supports the theory that high-fat/high-sugar foods stimulate the brain in the same way that drugs do," Schroeder said in the article. "It may explain why some people can’t resist these foods despite the fact that they know they are bad for them."
It's worth noting that the data has yet to be published or submitted for peer review. And a scientist friend of CultureMap cautions that using studies with this methodology to say one thing is "more addictive" than another is tricky.
Still, maybe err on the side of caution and stay out of the cookie aisle while the scientists sort it out.
To answer the obvious question: yes, the rats ate the middle first.