Austin knows how to party. [Pictured: W Austin’s Wet Deck pool party [https://austin.culturemap.com/news/society/06-14-16-summer-skip-day-w-austin-hotel-ferris-bueller-pool-party/#slide=0] June 10]
Photo by Ben Porter
Variety isn't just the spice of life; it seems it's also the key to partying like a rock star. And thanks to a plethora of places to drink, listen to music, and just have a good time, Austin ranks among the top cities to party in the country.
That's according to Wanderu, a booking agency for train and bus travel, which surveyed the Yelp API and added up the number of grown-up entertainment venues to determine the cities with the most options, which Wanderu translated into the biggest party hubs in the U.S.
With 667 bars, 137 music venues, and 52 dance clubs, Austin ranks the 12th best party town in the nation. We've also got a handful of beer gardens, 6 country dance halls, 18 jazz and blues venues, 10 pool halls, 31 karaoke bars, and a few piano bar for good measure.
But we're not the biggest party animals in Texas. That distinction goes to Houston, which ranks sixth on the list. Dallas also edges us out, at No. 9.
Claiming the number No. 1 spot, based on variety of options, is New York City, followed by Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, and San Diego.
"The race for the top spot was tough and, as expected, it came down to the age-old question of what city is better, New York or Los Angeles," according to Wanderu.
"While LA came out as the top destination for dance lovers, karaoke enthusiasts, live music fans, and pool shooters, NYC’s almost-double number of bars gave it a significant boost, making it the top party hub in the United States."
Mikey Madison and Jeremy Allen White in The Social Reckoning.
The 2010 film The Social Network — about the early years of Facebook after Mark Zuckerberg created the social media site — was a landmark movie in many ways. But given the time it was made, just four years after it went public beyond colleges, the impact Facebook had on society was minimal compared to what it is today. (The film’s tagline references 500 million users on Facebook; there are now more than 3 billion).
All of which is to say that there's plenty of fertile material for a follow-up film to explore, which writer/director Aaron Sorkin does quite well in The Social Reckoning. Zuckerberg (played this time by Jeremy Strong) is an important but supporting character in this story, which focuses on Wall Street Journal investigative reporter Jeff Horwitz (Jeremy Allen White). Horwitz is in pursuit of anyone willing to spill dirt on the inner workings of Facebook, which leads him to Frances Haugen (Mikey Madison), who works on the Civic Integrity team at the now-giant company.
At first reluctant to disclose much, Haugen gradually gives Horwitz access to internal files that show that Facebook engaged in behind-the-scenes work to boost engagement on the site with little regard for how it would affect the well-being of its users. Their story, which takes place over the course of two years between 2019 and 2021, is intercut with scenes in which Zuckerberg is being prepped for testimony before Congress by Raya (Wunmi Mosaku), Charlie (Bill Burr), and others.
The key to Sorkin’s success in Hollywood has always been his fast-paced, overlapping dialogue, and there’s much of it to enjoy in this film. Most of the film is just people talking in rooms, so the script needs to have Sorkin’s signature style to keep the story compelling. He achieves that goal through lines that indicate the righteous indignation, quirks, and sense of humor of the characters, feelings that easily translate over to the audience.
Sorkin is clearly on one side in his storytelling, and it’s not the side that doesn’t seem to care that its users are being harmed by its product. Sorkin gilds the lily multiple times throughout the film in big and small ways, and your enjoyment of the movie may lie in your ability to roll with his choices instead of nitpicking details (like the fact that Zuckerberg didn’t testify before Congress in the crucial year depicted in the film).
Still, there’s the unshakeable feeling that the movie is too little, too late. Even though it’s set just 5-7 years ago, the advances in technology and the division of the country in the time since make it feel like a completely different world. The Social Network had the advantage of showing things that most viewers didn’t know well. The basics of this film played out in headlines around the world, and the issues the characters debate in it seem positively quaint compared to what’s happening now.
White has been hit-and-miss as a movie actor, but he’s in his sweet spot in this film, rattling off lines with ease and making Horwitz alternately cocky and empathetic. Madison does well in her first film since winning an Oscar for Anora, playing on Haugen’s passion and eccentricities effectively. Strong plays Zuckerberg as literally stiff — his neck and body movements are almost mechanical — a choice that works for the most part.
The Social Reckoning is not as good as The Social Network, but it manages to be gripping in its own way. Through Sorkin’s writing, better directing than he has delivered in other films, and committed performances by all of the actors, it becomes a story worth telling, even if its ideas have become antiquated.
---
The Social Reckoning opens in theaters on October 9.